Re: point 2 --- I imagine that the most effective strategy is to raise multiple issues simultaneously. At a certain point, incremental effort in hammering a single issue results in diminishing returns.
To borrow from the marketing world (where I work), it might be interesting if someone with access to messaging media spend adopts a media-…
Re: point 2 --- I imagine that the most effective strategy is to raise multiple issues simultaneously. At a certain point, incremental effort in hammering a single issue results in diminishing returns.
To borrow from the marketing world (where I work), it might be interesting if someone with access to messaging media spend adopts a media-mix model framework for evaluating which issues to focus on. At least in marketing, it's generally optimal to spread spend across many channels, not just the most effective channel. One could model latent net approval as an outcome and optimize the media strategy that minimizes net approval.
Re: point 2 --- I imagine that the most effective strategy is to raise multiple issues simultaneously. At a certain point, incremental effort in hammering a single issue results in diminishing returns.
To borrow from the marketing world (where I work), it might be interesting if someone with access to messaging media spend adopts a media-mix model framework for evaluating which issues to focus on. At least in marketing, it's generally optimal to spread spend across many channels, not just the most effective channel. One could model latent net approval as an outcome and optimize the media strategy that minimizes net approval.
A couple useful papers in this area:
https://storage.googleapis.com/gweb-research2023-media/pubtools/3806.pdf
https://storage.googleapis.com/gweb-research2023-media/pubtools/3804.pdf